On 13 December 2013 10:05, Jay Dobies <jason.dob...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Maybe this is a valid use case?
> You mention three specific nodes, but what you're describing is more likely > three concepts: > - Balanced Nodes > - High Disk I/O Nodes > - Low-End Appliance Nodes > > They may have one node in each, but I think your example of three nodes is > potentially *too* simplified to be considered as proper sample size. I'd > guess there are more than three in play commonly, in which case the concepts > breakdown starts to be more appealing. > > I think the disk flavor in particular has quite a few use cases, especially > until SSDs are ubiquitous. I'd want to flag those (in Jay terminology, "the > disk hotness") as hosting the data-intensive portions, but where I had > previously been viewing that as manual allocation, it sounds like the > approach is to properly categorize them for what they are and teach Nova how > to use them. > > Robert - Please correct me if I misread any of what your intention was, I > don't want to drive people down the wrong path if I'm misinterpretting > anything. You nailed it, no butchering involved at all! -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
