On 18-01-29 08:30:37, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > ... the > > only outstanding item is that oslo.versionedobjects seems to need > > another fix for the iso8601 bump. ... > > I took a look at the failing jobs for the oslo.versionobjects bump, and it > appears this is not directly related. > > There are failures in nova, cinder, and keystone with the new > oslo.versionedobjects. This appears to be due to a mix of UTC time handling in > these projects between their own local implementations and usage of the > timeutils inside oslo.versionedobjects. > > The right answer might be to get all of these local implementations moved out > into something like oslo.utils, but for the time being, these patches will > need > to land before we can raise oslo.versionedobjects (and raise the iso8601 > version that triggered this work). > > Cinder - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536182/2 > Nova - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535700/3 > Keystone - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538263/1 > > There are similar patches in other projects (I think they are all using the > same topic) that will need to land as well that don't appear to be covered in > the requirements cross jobs. >
Added them as depends-on to https://review.openstack.org/538549 -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
