On Wed Dec 11 14:15:22 2013, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to clarify the terminology being used for Tuskar, which > may be helpful so that we're sure that we're all talking about the > same thing :) I'm copying responses from the requirements thread and > combining them with current requirements to try and create a unified > view. Hopefully, we can come to a reasonably rapid consensus on any > desired changes; once that's done, the requirements can be updated.
Your mail client seems to wrap lines awkwardly, well past the standard length. Just seems kinda odd. > * UNDEPLOYED NODE - a node that has not been mapped with a role > * another option - UNALLOCATED NODE - a node that has not been > allocated through nova scheduler (?) > - (after reading lifeless's > explanation, I agree that "allocation" may be a misleading term under > TripleO, so I personally vote for UNDEPLOYED) Not to muddy the waters further, but 'undeployed' sounds a little bit to me like the node was deployed, and then we un-deployed it. I think 'nondeployed' eliminates that, but makes it sound fairly odd. I like James' "unmapped", FWIW. Though I guess it leaves the same ambiguity about whether it was mapped and then un-mapped, or if it's yet to be mapped. > * SIZE THE ROLES - the act of deciding how many nodes will need to be > assigned to each role > * another option - DISTRIBUTE NODES (?) - (I > think the former is more accurate, but perhaps there's a better way > to say it?) I don't love 'size the roles', though I'm not sure that 'distribute' has the same meaning. If I didn't already know what you meant, and you asked me what 'size the nodes' meant, I'd assume it was about the size of a given instance -- e.g., does node X need 2GB RAM or should I give it 4GB? What you're really doing is setting the 'count' of nodes, right? "Set Node Count"? (I don't love that particular phrasing either, but it seems more accurate/precise.) > Does this seem accurate? All feedback is appreciated! Thanks for starting this discussing, Mainn. I agree with the others that it's a good idea to get this stuff nailed down early on. -- Matt Wagner Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
