Doug Hellmann wrote: > That said, I'm more interested in settling the question of whether > changing the development cycle helps development teams in any way > before we consider other effects. Because if it doesn't do any good > then there's no reason to solve problems we won't have, and if we > agree it *does* do us some good then we're motivated to work out > the other details.
Exactly. That's what this proposal is about. Based on several discussions I had with developers working part-time on OpenStack at various events lately, it sounded like slowing down our pace could be helpful to them and generally reduce stress in OpenStack development. I know people who can spend 100% of their time upstream can cope with our current rhythm. I just observe that we have less and less of those full-time people and need to attract more of the part-time one. If this proposal is not helping developers and making OpenStack development less painful, I don't think we should do it :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
