Hey On 13 December 2017 at 17:12, Jimmy McArthur <ji...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> - It doesn't mean that teams can only meet in-person once a year. >> Summits would still provide a venue for team members to have an >> in-person meeting. I also expect a revival of the team-organized >> midcycles to replace the second PTG for teams that need or want to meet >> more often. >> > The PTG seems to allow greater coordination between groups. I worry that > going back to an optional mid-cycle would reduce this cross-collaboration, > while also reducing project face-to-face time. I can't speak for the Foundation, but I would think it would be good to have an official PTG in the middle of the cycle (perhaps neatly aligned with some kind of milestone/event) that lets people discuss plans for finishing off the release, and early work they want to get started on for the subsequent release). The problem with team-organised midcycles (as I'm sure everyone remembers), is that there's little/no opportunity for cross-project work. -- Cheers, Chris
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
