Hey all, We had a really productive conversation [0] regarding the outstanding concerns with the unified limits proposal. The initial implementation for unified limits should target a model so that we can do proper limit validation. The specification has been reworked to include the outcomes of the conversation.
I'm proposing we issue a specification freeze exception for the unified limits specification [1]. We've made a ton of good progress on it and wxy has been diligently updating the spec and implementation. If you have any concerns with the new direction or the discussion we had today, please let me know. If everyone is OK with the direction and the exception, we'll plan to have the specification smoothed out and merged by the end of next week. Thanks, Lance [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.2017-12-08.log.html#t2017-12-08T15:00:28 [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/keystone-specs+branch:master+topic:bp/unified-limits
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
