On 12/5/17, 11:37 AM, "Matt Riedemann" <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12/5/2017 2:52 AM, na...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Barbican's team are considering whether the Certificate Orders and CAs >>should be removed or not [1]. And we would like to hear information from >>other projects. If you are using this feature for your project, please >>raise your hand. We will discuss about this. >> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462363/ >> > >I see Peter Hamilton is +1 on this so I assume Nova is fine with it. > >As an outsider to Barbican, just reading the commit message I don't >really have any idea *why* this removal is happening; there is no link >to background discussion or a summary of whatever discussion has >happened, or if this is part of a larger series of changes to remove >support for a feature from the REST API - nor a release note. So you >might want to think about that from a discoverability / posterity point >of view. > >-- > >Thanks, > >Matt We originally announced deprecation of the CA features from Barbican in September 2016 [1], following lots of community discussion and input. Barbican currently emits a warning if a CA feature is configured. In this patch, we're finalizing the process by removing the code. I agree we need to get a better explanation into the release notes and documentation to document for history. Thanks! --Dave [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/103793.ht ml __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
