On Mon, Dec 04 2017, Jaze Lee wrote: > Right now, the dispatch will cost much time in http request. And > keystone auth token cost much time. Although we can configure it to > noauth, then anyone can update gnocchi database which is not we want.
> So what about to remove gnocchi http, and add a simple tcp socket, which > will send to gnocchi tcp server(which will also be created.). At > first, we think udp, … and then "anyone can update gnocchi database which is not you want." I'm not saying it's not a good idea, but your arguments don't sound right. :) There's already an issue here https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/issues/496 that you opened. At that point, you need more than "suggesting", you need to provide plan and code if you want that to happen "soon". :) -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info */
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
