On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:07 PM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Yes. Thanks for reformulate with better words. > > Just to be clear, I want to transform the scenarios into single-node > > jobs that deploy the SAME services (using composable services) from > > the undercloud, using the new ansible installer. I also want to keep > > running Tempest. > > And of course, like we said, keep one multinode job to test overcloud > > workflow, and OVB with some adjustments. > > > > Is it good? > > +1 > > > -- > -- James Slagle > -- > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > FYI, Slow and I have been pair programming to get the latest containerized undercloud work into the mainline CI. The old containerized undercloud work in featureset027 was working and not to be confused with this attempt. Here's a link http://logs.openstack.org/18/518118/2/check/legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers/4eef40f/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/undercloud_install.log.txt.gz
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
