Sending again, I don't think it went to openstack-operators@. --ruby
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby <ruby....@intel.com> wrote: > Hello ironic'ers, > > > > A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The > feature itself did not land yet (although some of the code has). Now that > the (nova) community has come up with traits, ironic wants to support node > traits, and there is a spec proposing that [2]. At the ironic node level, > this is VERY similar to the node tag support, so the thought is to drop > (not implement) the node tagging feature, since the node traits feature > could be used instead. There are a few differences between the tags and > traits. "Traits" means something in OpenStack, and there are some > restrictions about it: > > - max 50 per node > > - names must be one of those in os-traits library OR prefixed with > 'CUSTOM_' > > > > For folks that wanted the node tagging feature, will this new node traits > feature work for your use case? Should we support both tags and traits? I > was wondering about e.g. using ironic standalone. > > > > Please feel free to comment in [2]. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > --ruby > > > > [1] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/ > approved/nodes-tagging.html > > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504531/ > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
