On 2017-10-20 22:50:53 +0000 (+0000), Fox, Kevin M wrote: [...] > Ideally, there should be an OpenStack overarching architecture > team of some sort to handle this kind of thing I think.
There was one for a while, but it dissolved due to lack of community participation. If you'd like to help reboot it, Clint B. can probably provide you with background on the previous attempt. > Without such an entity though, I think the TC is probably > currently the best place to discuss it though? Contrary to the impression some people seem to have, the TC is not primarily composed of cloud architects; it's an elected body of community leaders who seek informed input from people like you. I've personally found no fault in the process and timeline the Keystone team followed in this situation but I'm also not the primary audience for their software, so it's good to hear from those who are about ways to improve similar cases in the future. However, I also understand that no matter how widely and carefully changes are communicated, there's only so much anyone can do to avoid surprising the subset of users who simply don't pay attention. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
