On 2017-09-06 10:40:14 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: [...] > OK, and we do want to use a FQDN as the hostnames inside the > guest? That's my key question. Random ServerFault questions seems > to suggest no clear answer to this [1]. [...]
As a data point, the servers maintained by the Infra team are consistently built with their FQDN as the instance name itself, and then the hostname and domainname set from that value in order to avoid the dreaded "foo.novalocal" sorts of FQDNs prevalent in so many OpenStack environments. At least for us, having OpenStack specify the domain is more of a nuisance to be worked around than anything. You may also want to consider asking a similar question on the operators ML, or perhaps sending them a pointer to this discussion so you can get more real-world feedback. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
