Excerpts from Tzu-Mainn Chen's message of 2013-12-06 07:37:20 -0800: > Hey all, > > We're starting to work on the UI for tuskar based on Jarda's wireframes, and > as we're doing so, we're realizing that > we're not quite sure what development methodology is appropriate. Some > questions: > > a) Because we're essentially doing a tear-down and re-build of the whole > architecture (a lot of the concepts in tuskar > will simply disappear), it's difficult to do small incremental patches that > support existing functionality. Is it okay > to have patches that break functionality? Are there good alternatives? >
I think Tuskar is early enough in its' life cycle that it has reached that magical "plan to throw one away" point where you can actually do this without disrupting anybody except yourselves, which actually sounds valuable in this case since you have chosen a different course. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
