On 2013-12-06 03:22, Ladislav Smola wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > > On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote: > > Hi, > like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to > date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over > time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted > with -core responsibilities. > > In this months review: > - Ghe Rivero for -core > - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core > - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core > - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core > - Jiri Tomasek for removal from -core > - Jamomir Coufal for removal from -core > > Existing -core members are eligible to vote - please indicate your > opinion on each of the three changes above in reply to this email. > > Ghe, please let me know if you're willing to be in tripleo-core. Jan, > Jordan, Martyn, Jiri & Jaromir, if you are planning on becoming > substantially more active in TripleO reviews in the short term, please > let us know. > > Hey there, > > thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current non-coder > it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially when UI was on hold and > I was designing future views. I'll continue working on designs much more, but > I will also keep an eye on code which is going in. I believe that UX reviews > will be needed before merging so that we assure keeping the vision. That's > why I would like to express my will to stay within -core even when I don't > deliver that big amount of reviews as other engineers. However if anybody > feels that I should be just +1, I completely understand and I will give up my > +2 power. I wonder whether there can be a sort of honorary core title. jcoufal is contributing a lot, but not that much with code or reviews. What purpose would this serve? The only thing core gives you is the ability to +2 in Gerrit. If you're not reviewing, "core" is meaningless. It's great to contribute to the mailing list, but being core shouldn't have any influence on that one way or another. This is a meritocracy where suggestions are judged based on their value, not whether the suggester has +2 ability (which honorary core wouldn't provide anyway, I assume). At least that's the ideal. I think everyone following the project is aware of Jaromir's contributions and a title isn't going to change that one way or another. -Ben
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev