On 5 December 2013 09:12, Keith Basil <kba...@redhat.com> wrote: >> This sounds reasonable to me. The code base for TuskarUI is building on >> Horizon and we are planning on integrating TuskarUI into Horizon once >> TripleO is part of the integrated release. The review skills and focus for >> TuskarUI is certainly more consistent with Horizon than the rest of the >> TripleO program.
Tuskar specifically (TripleO as a program isn't integrated; the Tuskar API project is what will get integrated). > Focus is needed on the Horizon bits to ensure that we have something to build > on > for the "operator" side of a deployment. One possible concern here is that > the Horizon > folk won't understand what's driving the UI need for Tuskar. Horizon already has functionality for the operator side of deployments, through admin specific functionality; I think it's entirely appropriate for operator web UI work to be housed in Horizon. I understand the concern that Horizon folk may not understand Tuskar - but that concern applies to Neutron and Cinder and Murano and Savannah and ... - as a UI layer for OpenStack, it's Horizon developers /role/ to come to understand the capabilities and needs of the API's they are presenting to users. I am totally confident that they are up to the task, particularly if the folk that are working on Tuskar are there to help Horizon folk understand better! -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
