On 5 December 2013 15:55, Steve Baker <sba...@redhat.com> wrote: > Yes, point taken. > > heat-core does a reasonable job of keeping up with review load, so there is > not yet a bottleneck. However the load is taken by a small team which would > definitely need to grow if we were to take on a new project.
Yup. > There are certainly some reviewers who will be ready for nomination soon if > they continue increasing their review volume: > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt > > It may be appropriate to relax the core review approval to a single +2 on > heatr in the early stages of the project. I think thats ultimately counterproductive. Folk can build on in-progress patches when they really need to - gerrit supports that. http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-openreviews.html Stats since the last revision without -1 or -2 : Average wait time: 1 days, 11 hours, 41 minutes 1rd quartile wait time: 0 days, 18 hours, 47 minutes Median wait time: 1 days, 1 hours, 23 minutes 3rd quartile wait time: 1 days, 16 hours, 6 minutes So, 75% of patches are sitting for more than a day before being looked at at all : thats says to me that Heat could use more core reviewers (many hands, light work) - ideally with a distributed project like us, most things would be looked at in 9-12 hours or less; however these figures are much happier than nova, and nova still achieves pretty good velocity! -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
