> -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:00 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Cockroachdb for Keystone Multi-master > > On 05/31/2017 02:14 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Either way, it should be much simpler to manage slave lag than to deal > > with a Galera cluster that won't accept any writes at all because it > > can't get quorum. > > Would CockroachDB be any better at achieving quorum? > > Genuinely curious. :)
[Amrith Kumar] Last I read about this was in [1] and it sounded like it would be no better, or worse. [1] https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/consensus-made-thrive/ > > Best, > -jay > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
