Hi David, I have added my comments underneath line # 97 till line #110, it is mostly aligned with your proposal with some modification. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
Thanks for your time, Arvind -----Original Message----- From: Tiwari, Arvind Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 4:22 PM To: Adam Young; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); David Chadwick Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition Hi Adam and David, Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good progress. I have replied to your comments and also added some to support my proposal https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition David, I like your suggestion for role-def scoping which can fit in my Plan B and I think Adam is cool with plan B. Please let me know if David's proposal for role-def scoping is cool for everybody? Thanks, Arvind -----Original Message----- From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:44 AM To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Henry Nash; dolph.math...@gmail.com; David Chadwick Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition On 11/26/2013 06:57 PM, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Based on our discussion over IRC, I have updated the below etherpad with > proposal for nested role definition Updated. I made my changes Green. It isn't easy being green. > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition > > Please take a look @ "Proposal (Ayoung) - Nested role definitions", I am > sorry if I could not catch your idea. > > Feel free to update the etherpad. > > Regards, > Arvind > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tiwari, Arvind > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:08 PM > To: David Chadwick; OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition > > Hi David, > > Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments > and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP. > > Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition > > Thanks again, > Arvind > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM > To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List > Cc: Henry Nash; ayo...@redhat.com; dolph.math...@gmail.com; Yee, Guang > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition > > Hi Arvind > > I have just added some comments to your blueprint page > > regards > > David > > > On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id >> binding with roles BP >> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>. >> I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to >> support this BP. >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition >> >> Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and >> pros and cons analysis >> >> >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition >> >> >> >> Please take look and let me know your thoughts. >> >> >> >> It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Arvind >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
