On 5/9/2017 1:11 PM, Waines, Greg wrote:
I am looking for guidance on where to propose some “_VM Heartbeat /
Health-check Monitoring_” functionality that I would like to contribute
to openstack.



Briefly, “_VM Heartbeat / Health-check Monitoring_”

·         is optionally enabled thru a Nova flavor extra-spec,

·         is a service that runs on an OpenStack Compute Node,

·         it sends periodic Heartbeat / Health-check Challenge Requests
to a VM
over a virtio-serial-device setup between the Compute Node and the VM
thru QEMU,

·         on loss of heartbeat or a failed health check status will
result in fault event, against the VM, being
reported to Vitrage thru its data-source API.



Where should I contribute this functionality ?

·         put it ALL in Vitrage ... both the monitoring and the
data-source reporting ?

·         put the monitoring in Nova, and just the data source reporting
in Vitrage ?

·         other ?



Greg.











p.s. other info ...



Benefits of “VM Heartbeat / Health-check Monitoring”

·         monitors health of OS and Applications INSIDE the VM

o    i.e. even just a simple Ack of the Heartbeat would validate that
the OS is running, IO mechanisms (sockets, etc)
are working and processes are getting scheduled

·         health-check status reporting can trigger and report on either
high-level or detailed application-specific audits within the VM,

·         the simple virtio-serial-device interface thru QEMU is UP very
early in VM life cycle and is virtually _always up_

o    i.e. its available for reporting issues virtually all the time,

o           ... compared to reporting issues over Tenant Network to a
remote VNFManager which relies on Ethernet and IP Networking within the
VM itself and then any provider network and adjacent routers around the
compute nodes ...

·         uses a simple “Line-Delimited JSON” Format over virtio serial
device ( http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Virtio-serial_API )

o    simple to implement protocol inside VM, in pretty much any language

o    ( although would provide reference implementation )

·         provides more thorough instance monitoring than libvirt’s
emulated hardware watchdog (
https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsWatchdog )



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


How is this different from the watchdog action flavor extra spec / image property which already exists?

--

Thanks,

Matt

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to