On 2017-05-03 14:04:40 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2017-05-03 13:23:11 -0400: > > On 05/03/2017 01:02 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-03 18:16:29 +0200: [...] > > > Knowing what will be discussed in advanced also helps everyone > > > collect their thoughts and be ready to contribute. > > > > What about ensuring that every agenda topic is more than a line, > > but includes a full paragraph about what the agenda topic > > proposer expects it will cover. A lot of times the agenda items > > are cryptic enough unless you are knee deep in things. > > > > That would help people collect their thoughts even more and > > break away from the few minutes of delay in introducing the > > subject (the introduction of the subject would be in the > > agenda). > > If the goal is to move most of the discussion onto the mailing > list, we could link to the thread(s) there, too.
This seems like a great idea to me. Granted in many cases we already have a change proposed in Gerrit containing a (potentially) lengthy explanation, but duplicating some of that on the agenda can't hurt. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
