Hello folks,

I've created a blueprint to move over to oslo.messaging per Jarret's comments 
below: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican

I'd also note that out of the box barbican does not use celery in order to 
simplify demo/standalone deployments...asynchronous calls simply invoke their 
worker tasks directly. 

Thanks,
John
________________________________________
From: cloudk...@googlegroups.com [cloudk...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of 
Jarret Raim [jarret.r...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 9:16 PM
To: Fox, Kevin M; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); 
Russell Bryant
Cc: openstack...@lists.openstack.org; cloudkeep@googlegroups. com; 
barbi...@lists.rackspace.com
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

> I've been anxious to try out Barbican, but haven't had quite enough time
to
> try it yet. But finding out it won't work with Qpid makes it unworkable
for us
> at the moment. I think a large swath of the OpenStack community won't be
> able to use it in this form too.

As mentioned in the other thread, Barbican will be looking at oslo messaging
for Icehouse.

In the meantime, you can configure celery to use a pass-through (e.g. no
queue needed). This is the configuration we use for dev / testing. The
documentation for that can be found in the celery docs here:
http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/userguide/


Jarret

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to