Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-04-04 12:19:36 -0500: > On 04/04/2017 09:19 AM, Jay S Bryant wrote: > > Monty, > > > > I agree with your approach. Think we should not break other projects > > with a change like this and the answer thus far has been to just patch > > each project individually to work around the issues introduced by > > eventlet. So, I support this approach and think Sean would as well. > > To follow up with everyone - dims and I spent a bit of time this morning > testing combinations of things, and it seems that master of eventlet > actually also does not fix things - there are some issues that will just > need to be figured out. > > The suggested path forward at the moment is to pull designate out of the > requirements-sync process so it can stay pinned at 0.19 while the issues > are sorted out. A patch to bump designate back to 0.20.1 can accompany > the patch to fix it for 0.20.1 - and can be done as people have time, > rather than in a rush. >
Has anyone made any attempt to eliminate eventlet from Designate? The less places it's used, the less problems OpenStack seems to have, IMO. But I can see on cursory examination it has quite a few services so perhaps it's just too entrenched? __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev