On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 07:16:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > This is definitely a trade off, I know the last time we tried UCA we had > such a high failure rate we had to revert. But, that was a much younger > libvirt that was only just starting to get heavy testing in OpenStack. > So it feels like it's worth a shot. It will at least be interesting to > see if it makes things better. > > The libvirt bump will bring in libvirtd and live migration postcopy for > testability on the Nova side, both of which would be good things.
NB, you'd need corresponding QEMU bump too for post-copy, but IIUC the UCA contain that, so it'd be fine. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
