+1. If there is a use case missing from the neutron API that this allows, we can also expand the API to address it.
On Mar 28, 2017 07:16, "Matt Riedemann" <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/27/2017 11:42 PM, Rui Chen wrote: > >> Thank you Matt, the background information is important. Seems all the >> peoples don't know how the add-fixed-ip API works, >> and there is no exact use case about it. Now neutron port-update API >> also support to set multiple fixed ip for a port, and >> the fixed-ip updating will sync to nova side automatically (I had >> verified it in my latest devstack). Updating fixed-ip for >> specified port is easier to understand for me in multiple nics case than >> nova add-fixed-ip API. >> >> So if others known the orignal API design or had used nova add/remove >> fixed-ip API and would like to show your use cases, >> it's nice for us to understand how the API works and when we should use >> it, we can update the api-ref and add exact usage, >> avoid users' confusion about it. Feel free to reply something, thank you. >> >> > If the functionality is available via Neutron APIs, we should just > deprecate the multinic API like we did for the other network API proxies in > microversion 2.36. This reminds me that Alex Xu had a blueprint for > deprecating the multinic API [1] but it needs to be updated for Pike. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/384261/ > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev