On 12/02/2013 10:59 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> I think that this is certainly different. It is something that we we want
> and need a user facing API.
> Examples:
>  - aggregates
>  - per host scheduling
>  - instance groups
> 
> Etc.
> 
> That is just taking the nova options into account and not the other
> modules. How doul one configure that we would like to have storage
> proximity for a VM? This is where things start to get very interesting and
> enable the cross service scheduling (which is the goal of this no?).

An explicit part of this plan is that all of the things you're talking
about are *not* in scope until the forklift is complete and the new
thing is a functional replacement for the existing nova-scheduler.  We
want to get the project established and going so that it is a place
where this work can take place.  We do *not* want to slow down the work
of getting the project established by making these things a prerequisite.

-- 
Russell Bryant

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to