Excerpts from Brant Knudson's message of 2017-03-15 10:27:49 -0500: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Julien Danjou wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > >> +1 for just pulling it under the oslo umbrella but not renaming it. As > > >> much as I like the uniformity oslo.keymanager would bring, I think it's > > >> already adopted well enough we just want to make it clear that it is > > >> blessed and ok to adopt. > > > > > > I don't even get why moving it under the Oslo umbrella is a win. > > > > > > What's the current problem people are trying to solve here? > > > > It's a governance problem. Basically if the abstraction layer is under > > the control of the same group as one of the drivers, it's not really an > > abstraction layer, and nobody will adopt it or develop another driver > > for it. > > > > See Clint's first answer in the thread for a more detailed explanation. > > > > -- > > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > > > > Can the Castellan team be broken out into a new project under the big tent > rather than having to go under oslo? Oslo as a catch-all made more sense > before the big tent. Also, I always thought part of the deal of moving > under oslo is that oslo core reviewers have +2 authority on the repos, but > it doesn't look like that's part of the proposal here which was a rename > and now is changing launchpad to make Castellan a subproject under oslo > (along with some documentation changes). > > - Brant
I assumed that bringing it into Oslo would involve adding the oslo-core team to whatever review team Castellan already has. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
