On 03/14/2017 06:04 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > So one more thing popped up again on IRC: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo.config_etcd_backend > > What do you think? interested in this work? > > Thanks, > Dims > > PS: Between this thread and the other one about Tooz/DLM and > os-lively, we can probably make a good case to add etcd as a base > always-on service.
As I mentioned in the other thread, there was specific and strong anti-etcd sentiment in Tokyo which is why we decided to use an abstraction. I continue to be in favor of us having one known service in this space, but I do think that it's important to revisit that decision fully and in context of the concerns that were raised when we tried to pick one last time. It's worth noting that there is nothing particularly etcd-ish about storing config that couldn't also be done with zk and thus just be an additional api call or two added to Tooz with etcd and zk drivers for it. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
