Matthew, Please see the last time i took inventory: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/pycryptodome+owner:dims-v
Thanks, Dims On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > So, pycrypto upstream is dead and has been for a while, we should look > at moving off of it for both bugfix and security reasons. > > Currently it's used by the following. > > barbican, cinder, trove, glance, heat, keystoneauth, keystonemiddleware, > kolla, openstack-ansible, and a couple of other smaller places. > > Development of it was forked into pycryptodome, which is supposed to be > a drop in replacement. The problem is that due to co-installability > requirements we can't have half of packages out there using pycrypto and > the other half using pycryptodome. We'd need to hard switch everyone as > both packages install into the same namespace. > > Another alternative would be to use something like cryptography instead, > though it is not a drop in replacement, the migration would be able to > be done piecemeal. > > I'd be interested in hearing about migration plans, especially from the > affected projects. > > -- > Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
