Hi Lawrence,

Thanks for raising this.
The 10.255.255.x range is used by lxcbr0 on the host, to assign the eth0
address to the containers.
In essence this won't cause any issues - since we use the eth1 address
(which is statically configured) and we add the host entries to /etc/hosts.

That said, I see the logs you are mentioning, and whilst this won't cause
any issues I think we should look to resolve those logs if possible - I'll
create a bug for that.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1668949

We do bug-triage once a week (on a Tuesday at 16:00 UTC) - so we'll
determine priority and if it's something worth fixing.

If you run into anymore issues or need help feel free to jump into
#openstack-ansible on Freenode, the channel is usually quite active, and
there are normally other deployers/operators or developers working with or
on OpenStack-Ansible who can help.

Thanks,
Andy


On 1 March 2017 at 10:51, Lawrence J. Albinson <lawre...@ljalbinson.com>
wrote:

> In the process of diagnosing an Ansible OpenStack multi-node build
> problem, I came across the following dnsmasq-dhcp errors in syslog.
>
> —— snip ——
> Feb 28 20:25:06 xh3 dnsmasq-dhcp[1956]: not giving name
> aio1-designate-container-f182826f to the DHCP lease of 10.255.255.226
> because the name exists in /etc/hosts with address 172.29.238.255
> Feb 28 20:25:06 xh3 dnsmasq-dhcp[1956]: not giving name
> aio1-swift-proxy-container-c298481d to the DHCP lease of 10.255.255.126
> because the name exists in /etc/hosts with address 172.29.237.136
> Feb 28 20:25:06 xh3 dnsmasq-dhcp[1956]: not giving name
> aio1-gnocchi-container-48fe5bde to the DHCP lease of 10.255.255.136
> because the name exists in /etc/hosts with address 172.29.239.156
> —— snip ——
>
> To simplify the situation, I built the All-in-One environment on a clean
> KVM-based Xenial 16.04.2 VM with a single non-DHCP NIC. The errors occur
> there too. This happens with both Ansible-OpenStack 15.0.0.0rc1 and 14.0.8.
>
> Are these errors a sign of misconfiguration on my part? Or are they a sign
> of a real problem or just noise?
>
> OpenStack itself would appear to be working.
>
> Kindest regards, Lawrence
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to