I added a note to the section on OVO to the etherpad to discuss this.

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have encountered a few issues with the Port object. This makes use of
> the ml2 database model. Mono lithic plugins do not populate the information
> and this can lead to breakages. My understanding is that plugin specific
> objects should be in the directory: neutron/objects/plugins. I am wondering
> if we should take the same approach here for the port bindings?
>
> Any thoughts on this matter? I guess we can discuss this next week.
>
> Thanks
>
> Gary
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to