On 27/11/13 18:12, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-11-27 08:09:33 -0800:
In the longer term, there seems to be a lot of demand for some sort of
template catalog service, like Glance for templates. (I disagree with
Clint that it should actually _be_ Glance the project as we know it, for
the reasons Steve B mentioned earlier, but the concept is right.) And
this brings us back to a very similar situation to the operator-provided
template catalog (indeed, that use case would likely be subsumed by this
one).
Could you provide a stronger link to Steve B's comments, I think I
missed them. Thanks!
"Hrm, glance is for large binary data and has a metadata model only for
OS images - the overlap with the needs of a template catalog don't seem
very obvious to me."
It was longer and more detailed in my recollection of it :D Sorry!
- ZB
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
