On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I also would not use migrate. sqlalchemy-migrate is a dead upstream and > we (OpenStack) have had to inherit it. For new projects, you should use > alembic. That's actively developed and maintained. Other OpenStack > projects are either already using it, or making plans to move to it. This is something I wanted to dig into at the summit in fact, mostly because I'm not sure I agree... Sure migrate is now an openstack project, but so is olso and we're happy to use that. So I don't think it being abandoned by the original author is a strong argument. Its not clear to me what alembic gives us that we actually want... Sure, we could have a non-linear stream of migrations, but we already do a terrible job of having a simple linear stream. I don't think adding complexity is going to make the world any better to be honest. These are the kind of issues I wanted to discuss in the nova db summit session if people are able to come to that. Michael -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
