----- Original Message -----
> Team,
> 
> We have a blueprint for logging architecture within Solum, which is an
> important feature to aid in debugging at runtime:
> 
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/logging
> 
> The team voted for a lightweight governance style, and because we are
> planning to skip our upcoming meeting doe to the ODS event, I plan to
> approver this blueprint in the absence of any objections here on the ML, or
> in #solum today. Please let me know your thoughts, as we want to be acting
> on an approved blueprint before posting an implementation.
> 
> Thanks,
> 

Comment I already replied to Jay in IRC about:

Be sure to consider the potential impact of threading/eventlet behavior on the 
logging infrastructure so that attributes are bound correctly to the 
appropriate caller.

Other than that the concept of tying user info to logging more broadly is +1 
from me.

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to