On 11/01/2013 10:29 AM, Alexander Kuznetsov wrote:
Jay. Do you have a plan to add a Savanna (type: Heat::Savanna) and Trove
  (type: Heat::Trove)  providers to the HOT DSL?

Hi Alexander,

No, but I'd be interested in working on them, particularly a Savannah provider for Heat. I can start on it once the instance group API extension is in Nova and wired into Heat.

Best,
-jay

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 10/31/2013 01:51 PM, Alexander Kuznetsov wrote:

        Hi Heat, Savanna and Trove teams,

        All this projects have common part related to software configuration
        management.  For creation,  an environment  user should specify a
        hardware parameter for vms:  choose flavor, decide use cinder or
        not,
        configure networks for virtual machines, choose topology for hole
        deployment. Next step is linking of software parameters with
        hardware
        specification. From the end user point of view, existence of three
        different places and three different ways (HEAT Hot DSL, Trove
        clustering API and Savanna Hadoop templates) for software
        configuration
        is not convenient, especially if user want to create an environment
        simultaneously involving components from Savanna, Heat and Trove.

        I can suggest two approaches to overcome this situations:

        Common library in oslo. This approach allows a deep domain specific
        customization. The user will still have 3 places with same UI
        where user
        should perform configuration actions.

        Heat or some other component for software configuration
        management. This
        approach is the best for end users. In feature possible will be some
        limitation on deep domain specific customization for configuration
        management.


    I think this would be my preference.

    In other words, describe and orchestrate a Hadoop or Database setup
    using HOT templates and using Heat as the orchestration engine.

    Best,
    -jay

        Heat, Savanna and Trove teams can you comment these ideas, what
        approach
        are the best?

        Alexander Kuznetsov.


        _________________________________________________
        OpenStack-dev mailing list
        [email protected].__org
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-dev
        <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>



    _________________________________________________
    OpenStack-dev mailing list
    [email protected].__org
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-dev 
<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>




_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to