On 10/30/2013 04:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 31 October 2013 08:37, Sandy Walsh <sandy.wa...@rackspace.com> wrote: >> Doh, sorry, left out the important part I had originally intended. >> >> The ZK unit tests could be split to not run by default, but if you're a >> ZK shop ... run them yourself. They might not be included in the gerrit >> tests, but should be the nature with heavy-weight drivers. >> >> We need to do more of this test splitting in general anyway. > > Yes... but. > > We need to aim at production. If ZK is going to be the production sane > way of doing it with the reference OpenStack code base, then we > absolutely have to have our functional and integration tests run with > ZK. Unit tests shouldn't be talking to a live ZK anyhow, so they don't > concern me.
Totally agree at the functional/integration test level. My concern was having to bring ZK into a dev env. We've already set the precedent with Erlang (rabbitmq). There are HBase (Java) drivers out there and Torpedo tests against a variety of other databases. I think the horse has left the barn. > > -Rob > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
