Yes, if we can do that it will be perfect. How should we arrange this? I
will arrive at the morning of 5th.
Yi
On Monday, October 28, 2013, Erik Moe wrote:
>
> Hi Yamahata,
>
> yes, unconference sounds good.
>
> I agree that quantum-network-bundle-api is in the same area. I missed this
> blueprint.
>
> /Erik
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Isaku Yamahata
> <isaku.yamah...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'isaku.yamah...@gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Erik and Li.
>> Unconference at the next summit?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:34:28PM -0700,
>> beyounn <beyo...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'beyo...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Erik,
>> >
>> > While we were discussing about the service VM framework, the trunk port
>> > support was also mentioned. I think people do see the needs for it.
>> >
>> > I have seen someone have mentioned another BP
>> >
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-network-bundle-apiin
>> > your BP already. Maybe it is same as what you are doing.
>> >
>> > And the trunk port use case can also impact how the zone being
>> constructed
>> > in the fwaas context (when a firewall VM uses a trunk port to connect
>> > multiple networks). The basic question is how we should present a trunk
>> port
>> > and the vlan on a trunk port to Neutron.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yi
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Erik Moe [mailto:emoe...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'emoe...@gmail.com');>]
>> > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:56 PM
>> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org');>
>> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN aware VMs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > We are looking into how to make it possible for tenant VMs to use VLAN
>> > tagged traffic to connect to different Neutron networks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The VID on frames sent/received will determine which Neutron network the
>> > frames are connected to.
>> >
>> >
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/vlan-aware-vms
>> >
>> > I would like to find others that also see the need for this kind of
>> > functionality and would like to discuss this.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Erik
>> >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org');>
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> --
>> Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamah...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'isaku.yamah...@gmail.com');>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org');>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
--
Android-x86
http://www.android-x86.org
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
