Hi,

I also collect the tests status for nova v3 api manually. You can find the status of v3 tests in this link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-v3-tests

Because there are some extensions that just extend the attribute of specific api reponse, or convert some input before specific api called. There is no url for these extension, but I think we also need check them. I collect the tempest tests according to the nova api code. check tests to the action
one by one, list the status file by file.

Due to these patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39609/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39621/ are still under reviewing. so we can't add tempest test for nova v3 api. (almost existing tests have been ported into v3, but these patches depend on the 39609 and 39621). The status of porting existing tests is also listed in this link. we will add the missing tests in v2
firstly, when it can be ported into v3, will port it.
*__*
Best Regards
Ivan Zhu

On 2013?10?15? 14:25, Masayuki Igawa wrote:
Hi,

First, thank you to an anonymous for updating this list!
     -> GET /{project_id}/servers/:server_id/diagnostics

And, I have updated: Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
   
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc

The summary of this list:
                                        different count from
Tested or not     # of APIs     ratio   the last time
-------------------------------------------------------
Tested API              124      49.6%          +2
Not Tested API           66      26.4%          -2
Not Need to Test(*1)     60      24.0%           0
-------------------------------------------------------
Total(*2):              250     100.0%           0
(*1) Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
(*2) not included v3 APIs

The tempest version is:
  commit f55f4e54ceab7c6a4d330f92c8059e46233e3560
  Merge: 86ab238 062e30a
  Author: Jenkins <jenk...@review.openstack.org>
  Date:   Mon Oct 14 15:55:59 2013 +0000

By the way, I saw a design summit proposal related to this topic(*3). I think
this information should be generated automatically. So I'd like to talk about
this topic at the summit session.
(*3) Coverage analysis tooling: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/171

This information would be useful for creating Tempest tests.
Any comments/questions/suggestions are welcome.

Best Regards,
-- Masayuki Igawa


Hi,

# I'm sorry for this resending because my last mail has unnecessary messages.


I have updated: Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
  
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc

The summary of this list:
                                        different count from
Tested or not    # of APIs      ratio   the last time
-------------------------------------------------------
Tested API              122      48.8%          +5
Not Tested API           68      27.2%          -5
Not Need to Test(*1)     60      24.0%           0
-------------------------------------------------------
Total(*2):              250     100.0%           0

(*1) Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
(*2) not included v3 APIs

I hope this information would be helpful for creating Tempest tests.
Any comments and questions are welcome.

Best Regards,
-- Masayuki Igawa


Hi, Tempest developers

I have made:
  Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
  
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc

This list shows what we should test. That is:
  * Nova has 250 APIs(not include v3 APIs).
  * 117 APIs are executed(maybe tested).
  * 73 APIs are not executed.
  * 60 APIs are not executed. But they maybe not need to test.
      -> Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.

So I think we need more tempest test cases.
If this idea is acceptable, can you put your name to 'assignee' at your 
favorites,
and implement tempest tests.

Any comments are welcome.

Additional information:
  I made this API list with modification of nova's code that based on
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25882/ (Abandoned).

Best Regards,
-- Masayuki Igawa






_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to