I think it's good to call that out, but also perhaps there should be some discussion with such deployers such changes?
-Rob On 15 October 2013 12:32, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > I was talking to Dan Smith today about a patch series I was starting to > work on. These changes affect people doing continuous deployment, so we > came up with the idea of tagging the commits with "UpgradeImpact", > similar to how we use DocImpact for changes that affect docs. > > This seems like a good convention to start using for all changes that > affect upgrades in some way. > > Any comments/suggestions/objections? If not, I'll get this documented on: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GitCommitMessages#Including_external_references > > -- > Russell Bryant > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
