Updated the subject [neutron] Hi All,
Is the extra route extension always tied to the router extension or can it live in a separate route-table container. If extra-route routes are available in separate container then sharing of such containers across networks is possible. Another reason to remove the dependency would be to have next hops that are not CIDRs. Next-hops should be allowed as interface or a VM instance such as NAT instance. This would make the extra route extension more generic. This way an extra-route container can be attached/bound to either a router extension or to a network as well. Many plugins do not need a separate router entity for most of the inter-network routing. Thanks, Rudra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
