Hi Joshua,
+1 to discuss it on oslo.db session!=) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic -- Mirantis Inc. On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Roman Podolyaka <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > This looks great! > > We definitely should consider this to become the base of oslo.db, as > currently DB code in oslo-incubator depends on oslo-config and has a few > drawbacks (e. g. global engine and session instances). > > We could discuss this in details at the summit (Boris has already proposed > a session for oslo.db lib - http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/13). > > Thanks, > Roman > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Joshua Harlow <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> In my attempt to not use oslo.cfg in taskflow I ended up re-creating a >> lot of what oslo-incubator db has but without the strong connection to >> oslo.cfg, >> >> I was thinking that a majority of this code (which is also partially >> ceilometer influenced) could become oslo.db, >> >> >> https://github.com/stackforge/taskflow/blob/master/taskflow/persistence/backends/impl_sqlalchemy.py >> (search >> for SQLAlchemyBackend as the main class). >> >> It should be generic enough that it could be easily extracted to be the >> basis for oslo.db if that is desirable, >> >> Thoughts/comments/questions welcome :-) >> >> -Josh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
