All, We've known for a while now that some duplication of work happened with respect to adding multiple worker processes to the neutron-server. There were a few mistakes made which led to three patches being done independently of each other.
Can we settle on one and accept it? I have changed my patch at the suggestion of one of the other 2 authors, Peter Feiner, in attempt to find common ground. It now uses openstack common code and therefore it is more concise than any of the original three and should be pretty easy to review. I'll admit to some bias toward my own implementation but most importantly, I would like for one of these implementations to land and start seeing broad usage in the community earlier than later. Carl Baldwin PS Here are the two remaining patches. The third has been abandoned. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/37131/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36487/ _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
