On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:29:23PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On 28 August 2013 21:13, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:43:21AM +0000, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > >> For a big project like nova the workload could be spread out more > >> like that. > > > > I don't think any kind of rotation system like that is really > > practical. Core team members need to have the flexibility to balance > > their various conflicting workloads in a way that maximises their > > own productivity. > > So does everyone else, surely? Are you saying 'I don't think I can > commit to regular reviewing', or are you saying 'all reviewers will be > unable to commit to regular reviewing'? Or something else?
No, IIUC, Joshua was suggesting that core team members spend one cycle doing reviews only, with no coding, and then reverse for the next cycle. That is just far too coarse/crude. Core team members need to be free to balance their time between reviews and coding work on an ongoing basis, just as any other member of the community can. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
