On Fri, Jul 19 2013, Sean Dague wrote: > I assume it would gracefully degrade to the existing static allocators if > something went wrong. If not, well that would be very bad. > > Ceilometer is an integrated project in Havana. Utilization based scheduling > would be a new feature. I'm not sure why we think that duplicating the > metrics collectors in new code would be less buggy than working with > Ceilometer. Nova depends on external projects all the time. > > If we have a concern about robustness here, we should be working as an > overall project to address that.
+1 -- Julien Danjou -- Free Software hacker - freelance consultant -- http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
