Jinja is fairly nice. Used it like matt for Pyramid Den 16. juli 2013 22:13 skrev "Nachi Ueno" <na...@ntti3.com> følgende:
> Hi folks > > Jinja2 looks have +3. > This is the winner? > > # My code can be done by Jinja2 also. > > so if we choose Jinja2, what's version range is needed? > > Thanks > Nachi > > > > 2013/7/16 Matt Dietz <matt.di...@rackspace.com>: > > I'll second the jinja2 recommendation. I also use it with Pyramid, and > > find it non-obtrusive to write and easy to understand. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sandy Walsh <sandy.wa...@rackspace.com> > > Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:34 AM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Cheetah vs Jinja > > > >>I've used jinja2 on many projects ... it's always been solid. > >> > >>-S > >> > >>________________________________________ > >>From: Solly Ross [sr...@redhat.com] > >>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:41 AM > >>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > >>Subject: [openstack-dev] [Change I30b127d6] Cheetah vs Jinja > >> > >>(This email is with regards to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36316/) > >> > >>Hello All, > >> > >>I have been implementing the Guru Meditation Report blueprint > >>(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/guru-meditation-report), > and > >>the question of a templating engine was raised. Currently, my version of > >>the code includes the Jinja2 templating engine (http://jinja.pocoo.org/ > ), > >>which is modeled after the Django templating engine (it was designed to > >>be an implementation of the Django templating engine without requiring > >>the use of Django), which is used in Horizon. Apparently, the Cheetah > >>templating engine (http://www.cheetahtemplate.org/) is used in a couple > >>places in Nova. > >> > >>IMO, the Jinja template language produces much more readable templates, > >>and I think is the better choice for inclusion in the Report framework. > >>It also shares a common format with Django (making it slightly easier to > >>write for people coming from that area), and is also similar to template > >>engines for other languages. What does everyone else think? > >> > >>Best Regards, > >>Solly Ross > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
