On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Monty Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 07/09/2013 11:43 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:39 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey > >> > >> The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The > >> "official title" is new. > >> > >> Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries > >> PTL: Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> > >> Mission Statement: > >> To produce a set of python libraries containing > infrastructure code > >> shared by OpenStack projects. The APIs provided by these > libraries > >> should be high quality, stable, consistent and generally > applicable. > >> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> What sort of code would not be "infrastructure" but would be "shared > >> by OpenStack projects"? Is the "infrastructure" redundant? > > > > Simply saying "code" isn't enterprisey enough > > > > (Point taken, removed :) > > > Can you add synergy? > +1 for renaming 'oslo' to 'synergism' > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- -Dolph
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
