I don't think this is a problem but I could be wrong.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Zhongyue Luo <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi team > > I'm currently trying to move the generate_sample.sh script in nova to oslo. > > Before pushing the patch to gerrit, I wanted to give the output directory > a default value if it was not stated so I was wondering where projects put > their sample config file at and did this: > > find . -name "*.conf*" ! -path "*.tox*" ! -path "*.venv*" | grep etc > > results: > ./ceilometer/etc/ceilometer/ceilometer.conf.sample > ./cinder/etc/cinder/cinder.conf.sample > ./nova/etc/nova/nova.conf.sample > ./swift/etc/swift.conf-sample > ./tempest/etc/tempest.conf.sample > ./glance/etc/glance-cache.conf > ./quantum/etc/quantum.conf > ./keystone/etc/keystone.conf.sample > > You can see that ceilometer, cinder, and nova put their sample config > files on ./etc/$PROJECTNAME while the others put it on ./etc > > So would this inconsistency be a problem? > > IMO, ./etc/$PROJECTNAME makes sense to me if consistency is an issue. > > Thoughts? > > -- > *Intel SSG/STOD/DCST/CIT* > 880 Zixing Road, Zizhu Science Park, Minhang District, 200241, Shanghai, > China > +862161166500 > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Regards Huang Zhiteng
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
