> Now I treat the flush as 'OpenSSL isn't interested in the result
    > of the last write anymore'.  I'm not sure this assumption is correct,
    > but it seems to work... (Well, it could cause duplicate messages

It does not sound correct.
Might be true for a read.
But, for a write, I'd think it would mean fflush().

What do your BIO functions do for UDP that the existing set of UDP BIO don't
do?  I have outstanding patches here.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to