"Salz, Rich via openssl-users" <openssl-users@openssl.org> skrev: (21 maj 2019 17:27:44 CEST) >> If it's a sarcasm, I'm missing the point. > >I was't being sarcastic, I was trying to show that the team, recently, >still liked the use of floating point. > >> There are use cases when one wants to mix/add extra randomness >from, e.g., an external source (that, for whatever reasons, is trusted >more than what's provided by the system). > >Then just set it to 1.0 and be done with it. That hardly helps on systems that don't have floating point at all. Cheers Richard > > > -- Skickat från min Android-enhet med K-9 Mail. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
- why does RAND_add() take "randomness&q... Laszlo Ersek
- Re: why does RAND_add() take "ran... Ken Goldman
- Re: why does RAND_add() take "... Salz, Rich via openssl-users
- Re: why does RAND_add() take &... Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: why does RAND_add() ta... Salz, Rich via openssl-users
- Re: why does RAND_add... Dennis Clarke
- Re: why does RAND_add... Richard Levitte
- Re: why does RAND... Salz, Rich via openssl-users
- Re: why does ... Ken Goldman
- Re: why does RAND_add() take &... Jakob Bohm via openssl-users
- AW: why does RAND_add() ta... Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: why does RAND_add... Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: why does RAND_add() ta... Dennis Clarke
- Re: why does RAND_add... Jakob Bohm via openssl-users
- RE: why does RAND_add() take "ran... Paul Dale
- Re: why does RAND_add() take "... Ken Goldman