---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Thiagu Mohan <thiag...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:39 PM Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Compiling openssl 1.0.2q for OS390-Unix To: Michael Wojcik <michael.woj...@microfocus.com>
Yes I am using the option for Configure as OS390-Unix only and using c89.sh from tools directory in the openssl tar file. Regards, Thaigu On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:50 AM Michael Wojcik < michael.woj...@microfocus.com> wrote: > > From: Thiagu Mohan [mailto:thiag...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 13:02 > > To: Michael Wojcik > > Please reply to the mailing list, and not to me directly. > > > PKCS12_AUTHSAFES_it these symbols must be typedefs. > > I don't know how you came to that conclusion, but it's wrong. A bit of > digging shows the *_it symbols are used to provide access to global > variables on platforms which do not automatically resolve non-function > symbols in shared libraries/objects. > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:24 PM Thiagu Mohan <thiag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I checked the source of 1.0.2n and 1.0.2q. these symbols are found in > libeay.num > > in both the sources and not in any other source code. > > Though the util/*.num files are included in the source tarballs, they're > not really source code. They're created by mkdef.pl. Unfortunately > mkdef.pl achieves a level of unreadableness that is impressive even by > Perl standards, so that's not much help. > > I'll be frank: This isn't a problem I've run into before, and I don't have > time at the moment to try to figure out what's causing it. Maybe someone > who has more experience in this particular area will chime in. > > You did run Configure for the OS390-Unix target, right? And it's using the > c89.sh wrapper from the tools directory? > > -- > Michael Wojcik > Distinguished Engineer, Micro Focus > > > -- Thiagu Mohan -- Thiagu Mohan
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
