> On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
> Was thinking about ED488 last night. I am personally not interested in these
> larger curves, but perhaps I can make my draft 'more complete' if I include
> 488 along with 25519.
>
> Are there any parameters beyond changing the algorithm from ed25519 to ed488?
> Is a hash needed for the version of ed488 implemented?
Ed448 is a drop-in-replacement for Ed25519, only the sizes of keys and
signatures
change.
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
